Book Review
Who Is Who In Hindu
Mythology (Vols. 1 & 2). Author: Surya N. Maruvada.
Publishers: Notion Press. Available for ordering from Amazon: https://amzn.to/2Z48Ukz (India) https://amzn.to/3dr9GNS (Outside India)
The days when children learnt stories from Indian Itihāsas at
the knees of their grandpas are sadly long gone. The potent, venomous mix of the three Ms—Macaulay,
missionaries and Marx had sufficiently vitiated the learning of the
intermediate generations to such an extent that they are confused and
ambivalent in their approach to matters concerning the Sanātana Dharma. The
missionaries wanted to uproot the Sanātana Dharma and supplant it with
their own religion. If Macaulay’s supremacist approach to Indian thought
dictated the course of educational curricula during the British rule, the domination of the educational
system by the left–illiberal mobs post–independence finished the job. As Koenraad Elst observed
in DecolonizingThe Hindu Mind,
all Western knowledge and scientific thought (including those borne out of pre–Christian
Graeco–Roman achievements) were attributed to Christianity while the Sanātana
Dharma was depicted as no more than a cult order, backward and regressive.
India had had its own
period of “Dark Ages” from the first Mohammedan invasions in the tenth century to
the end of the British rule in the middle of the twentieth century. The advent
of independence, instead of heralding cultural renaissance, did the opposite. Indian achievements in arts, culture, philosophy and spirituality, and
science and technology were deliberately expunged from school text books. Instead
schools and colleges were taught a fictitious construct called syncretic
culture. For example, Elst pointed out
To describe Moghul painting (a
Hindu contribution to Islamicate culture) as a “contribution of Islam to
India’s composite culture”, as secularist discourse has it, indicates a muddled
understanding of Islamic religion and Islamicate culture.
Marxists are adept at
co–opting pop cultural modes like song, drama, cinema and etc. as vehicles for insidious
indoctrination. After Macaulayesque education sucked out all traditional forms
of Sanātana Dharmic knowledge from curricula, mass media like
newspapers, magazines and cinema did the rest. As it happened, for nearly a
century Madras was the centre of arts and culture of the southern Indian
states. Exponents of Indian arts and culture who gravitated to the city were
willy–nilly sucked into the black hole fertilised by the three Ms—of Macaulay,
missionaries and Marx. It was they who did the insidious job of indoctrinating
several generations of Indian school and college children into loathing their
own cultural ancestry. The glitz and glamour of the silver screen has an
undoubted charm for the youth and its appeal has a deeper and longer–lasting
impact on impressionable minds. Therefore if movies distorted characters of
Rāmāyaṇa or Māhābhārata Indian youth were inevitably led to believe that the Sanātana
Dharma was an iniquitous religion, forgetting Svāmi Vivekānada’s aphorism
about Sanātana Dharma being a religion that is “spiritual in content,
scientific in approach and universal in appeal”.
Macaulayesque
education killed the spirit of contemplation, inquiry and introspection that
were the bedrock of Sanātana Dharmic education and instead bred implicit
and unquestioning obedience to what was taught. Left–illiberal thought inbred
negativity. Thankfully the trend is reversing at last.
How
do we rekindle interest in India’s ancient lore, especially after several
generations of Indians gave up on learning Saṁskṛtaṁ (another left–illiberal
conspiracy), the language in which the wealth of our knowledge is encoded? India
has such a rich repertoire of sacred texts that a lifetime may not suffice to
read the entire corpus. And then there are perversions of the texts. A
beginning could be made by reading the Itihāsas and understanding them
without stripping their component stories out of context. As C. Rajagopalachari
observed
“A little knowledge of the laws of
nature and the wonders of science, specially when that knowledge is acquired
second–hand, without the chastening influence of effort and investigation, acts
as a wine on some natures. Their sense of proportion is upset. The unknown is
not only unknown but ceases to exist for them.” (1935. The Bhagavad–Gita.
Delhi. Hindustan Times Ltd. p.6)
It
is in this context the present Encyclopaedia assumes importance. It includes
sketches of all characters from our Itihāsas providing them context. The Itihāsas were stories of Gods but they were contextualised in their human incarnations. What
societal values changed between the times of Rāmāyaṇa and Māhābhārata?
How does Māhābhārata treat Kuñti as a virgin even though
she begot a son before marriage? Why did Srī Kṛṣna who knew the outcome of the
war, and could, did not prevent it? There may be hardly anyone who wants to
know the names of the ninety–eight Kauravās but who were Srī Kṛṣna’s five
consorts apart from the well–known three? The voluminous book (in two volumes) introduces
the reader to topics ranging from the trivia to the sublime and from the
mundane to the scientific. For example while introducing the book the author observes
On the world
where Brahma, the creator in the Hindu Trinity resides, the length of a day is
equivalent to many years on earth. While the huge difference may be a stretch,
the concept of a different time scale on different worlds was not known until a
few hundred years ago.
Modern
science recognises this as the ‘theory of time dilation’ which is an off–shoot
of the theory of relativity. The author expended enormous amounts of time in
collecting and collating information from a variety of texts. One hopes that
the Encyclopaedia will be useful not only for the world–wide Indian
diaspora to obtain gleanings from their spiritual heritage but other scholars
desirous of understanding the rich spiritual and philosophical underpinnings of
the Sanātana Dharma.
