For nearly ten
years Congress, the ruling party at the centre brushed aside demands for
a separate Telangana state. This is the fourth time that the issue has become a
national political issue since the formation of Andhra Pradesh in 1956. Political
leaders and parties either raised the demand for a separate state or supported
agitations purely based on electoral considerations. Marri Chenna Reddy’s
somersaults on the issue are a case in point. In 1956 he was for a united
Andhra Pradesh. He later changed his stance and became a votary of a separate
Telangana state. In 1968 the AP High Court annulled his election to the state
assembly and debarred him from contesting elections for six years. ‘Vandemataram’ Ramachandra Rao
of the Arya Samaj (and later the BJP) challenged Chenna Reddy’s election
on the grounds that he appealed to the religious
sentiments of the Muslims. (See Election Law Reports Volume XXXVII
p
269 - 349). The judgement was upheld by the Supreme Court. Forced out of electoral
politics he floated the Telangana Praja Samithi (TPS) to remain relevant in
politics. His TPS won 10 Lok Sabha seats in the 1971 general election. After
his return to electoral politics and after being suitably rewarded by the Congress
party he merged his TPS with the Congress.
In 2001
Chandra Babu Naidu walked into a trap cunningly laid by Y S Rajasekhara Reddy.
CBN had a problem in that he had too many claimants from the Velama
community and too few cabinet berths. But those were heady days for him. The
blemish of back-stabbing his father-in-law was behind him and he returned to
power for a second time in 1999, riding on the coat tails of Atal Behari
Vajpayee. Confident he would be able to contain the fallout he relegated K.
Chandrasekhara Rao to the post of Deputy Speaker.
With a deft
Machiavellian stroke YSR inveigled KCR to come out of the TDP and form a new
party. Thus was the TRS born. YSR aligned with the TRS just before the 2004
general election, with a promise to help the formation of the Telangana state,
a promise which he had no intention of keeping. During his tenure (and life) he
had repeatedly proved that the demand for Telangana did not enjoy popular
support. The TRS’ tally in the state assembly and local bodies had continually
declined.
In 2009 CBN
wanted to do a YSR but he lacked the latter’s deft touch and perhaps his finesse.
After tasting power and been in office for nine years Chandra Babu Naidu could
not stomach the 2004 defeat. He should have taken it in his stride. A good
leader does not sacrifice his core beliefs for temporary gains. But that was
what CBN did. By 2009 CBN was ready to walk up a wall if it would make him
'CEO' again. Seeking to make substantial inroads into Telangana and probably
misled by the overconfidence of his own regional leaders he blundered into an
alliance with the TRS. However, during the closing phases of the election
campaign KCR deserted CBN and walked into the NDA camp but that was a different
matter. At this time, the TDP gave its consent for the formation of the
Telangana state.
It
was CBN’s somersault that breathed new life into the Telangana
agitation, which was getting nowhere, and forced the Congress party’s hand.
It also brought matters to a head from which
there was no return. Therefore the people of Seema-Andhra will have to thank
CBN for the bifurcation of the state. Till then, YSR’s view on the
issue prevailed and the Congress was against the formation of the new
state. It did not have to pronounce its stand, the excuse being the state’s
principal opposition party was opposed to the formation of the Telangana state.
CBN’s consent
for Telangana and YSR’s death in September 2009 changed the political dynamics
and in a way foreclosed the issue. K. Rosaiah who succeeded YSR as the interim
Chief Minister could not withstand the political turmoil caused by KCR’s fast
unto death on the one hand and YSR’s son’s revolt within the party on the
other. Based on his recommendation the centre was forced to concede the demand
for the new state. The ‘victory’ made KCR a hero in Telangana. For the centre,
there was no going back and it was only a matter of time before a decision had
to be taken.
The stand of
the CPM on the Telangana issue was true to its character, Janus-faced. The
party could always reconcile diametrically opposite views. While as a principle
it opposed formation of new states, it would not oppose the formation of
Telangana if the centre wished to do so.
Just before
the 2009 election, the wily YSR struck with another of his machinations. This
time he contrived the formation of Chiranjivi’s PRP. Had he been alive the
merger of the PRP with the Congress would have been sooner. But his
calculation was right. The PRP splintered anti-Congress votes and Congress
was returned to power.
When in
alliance with the TDP, the BJP stoutly argued against the bifurcation of the
state. After the TDP severed its ties with the BJP, ostensibly because it lacked secular credentials (which the TDP seems to have suddenly discovered!) the BJP reverted to its advocacy of smaller states. Both the parties now find themselves
in a quandary in the Seema-Andhra region and do not know how to come out
of it.
Why did the Congress
party which has been dillydallying on Telangana for more than four decades
suddenly awake to the need for decisive action? It doesn’t require great intelligence
to find an answer. As many political analysts opined, it is based on electoral
calculations for 2014. However it is the behavior
of its Seema-Andhra leaders that is far from exemplary. They knew for quite
some time that the decision to split the state was in the offing. Yet, lured by
the crumbs of power thrown at them, they pretended that it was not happening
and fooled their constituents. They have underestimated the
emotional attachment their constituents have with Hyderabad (it is all about
Hyderabad!). ‘You cannot fool all the people all the time’, might be a cliché
but it is nevertheless true.
